Burke v Lynch & Ors [2016] IESC 38 (12 July 2016)
There was no error by the High Court in refusing leave for judicial review as the delivery of reminder letters by Gardaí through an open door did not warrant certiorari or an injunction, and judicial review was not the appropriate remedy for the relief sought.
- Citation
- [2016] IESC 38
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: John A. Burke; Respondents: Robert Lynch and Others under Superintendent Tipperary Garda Station and the Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Refusal of Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Service of Legal Documents, Police Powers, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John A. Burke
Applicant/appellant
Robert Lynch and Others under Superintendent Tipperary Garda Station and the Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Refusal of Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in refusing leave to apply for judicial review regarding Gardaí delivering fine notices to the appellant's house
- 2 Whether judicial review is the appropriate mechanism to restrain Gardaí from entering the appellant's home to deliver documents
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error by the High Court in refusing leave for judicial review as the delivery of reminder letters by Gardaí through an open door did not warrant certiorari or an injunction, and judicial review was not the appropriate remedy for the relief sought.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No leave granted for judicial review
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment