Goshawk Dedicated Ltd & ors -v- Life Receivables Irl. Ltd [2009] IESC 7 (30 January 2009)
The Supreme Court held that the issue of whether an Irish court may stay proceedings in favour of prior proceedings in a non-Member State, in light of the Brussels I Regulation, is not acte clair and has not been definitively answered by the ECJ. The Court determined that a reference to the European Court of Justice is necessary to clarify whether the Regulation precludes a stay in such circumstances, given the absence of clear guidance and the express exclusion of this scenario in Owusu v. Jackson.
- Citation
- [2009] IESC 7
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Goshawk Dedicated Limited; Plaintiff/respondent: Kite Dedicated Limited (formerly Goshawk Dedicated (No. 2) Ltd); Plaintiff/respondent: Cavell Management Services Ltd; Plaintiff/respondent: Cavell Managing Agency Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Life Receivables Ireland Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Supreme Court; Reference for Preliminary Ruling to ECJ
- Outcome
- Reference to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling; no final determination on the appeal pending ECJ response.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Lis Alibi Pendens, Forum Non Conveniens, Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments, Brussels I Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goshawk Dedicated Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Kite Dedicated Limited (formerly Goshawk Dedicated (No. 2) Ltd)
Plaintiff/respondent
Cavell Management Services Ltd
Plaintiff/respondent
Cavell Managing Agency Ltd
Plaintiff/respondent
Life Receivables Ireland Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Supreme Court; Reference for Preliminary Ruling to ECJ
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an Irish court may stay proceedings where prior proceedings are pending in a non-Member State involving the same cause of action and parties, in light of the Brussels I Regulation.
- 2 Whether the doctrine of lis alibi pendens or forum non conveniens survives under the Brussels I Regulation when the competing forum is a non-Member State.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that the issue of whether an Irish court may stay proceedings in favour of prior proceedings in a non-Member State, in light of the Brussels I Regulation, is not acte clair and has not been definitively answered by the ECJ. The Court determined that a reference to the European Court of Justice is necessary to clarify whether the Regulation precludes a stay in such circumstances, given the absence of clear guidance and the express exclusion of this scenario in Owusu v. Jackson.
Court Disposition
Reference to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling; no final determination on the appeal pending ECJ response.
Orders
- Parties to prepare draft terms of reference for the ECJ; submissions to be heard on the draft reference.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment