Coleman v MGN Ltd [2012] IESC 20 (15 March 2012)
The plaintiff failed to plead or provide evidence of internet publication of the Daily Mirror in 2003 accessible in Ireland, and thus failed to establish jurisdiction of the Irish courts over the alleged defamation.
- Citation
- [2012] IESC 20
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: John Coleman; Defendant/appellant: MGN Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order Refusing to Decline Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Irish courts have no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Internet Publication, Defamation, Council Regulation EC No. 44/2001, Proof of Publication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Coleman
Plaintiff/respondent
MGN Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order Refusing to Decline Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Irish courts have jurisdiction over an alleged defamation published online by a UK-based newspaper
- 2 Whether there was sufficient pleading and evidence of internet publication accessible in Ireland to establish jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to plead or provide evidence of internet publication of the Daily Mirror in 2003 accessible in Ireland, and thus failed to establish jurisdiction of the Irish courts over the alleged defamation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Irish courts have no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the proceedings.
Orders
- Order that the Court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the proceedings.
- No order as to costs in the High Court or Supreme Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment