Dalgety Agriculture Ltd / Spillers Ltd/ Thomas Hill & Company Ltd. [1998] IECA 502 (16th June, 1998)
The Competition Authority found that the Know-How Licensing Agreement did not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in the relevant market, given the insignificant market share of the licensee, the presence of effective competition, and the deletion of potentially restrictive clauses. Therefore, the agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1998] IECA 502
- Parties
- Notifying Party: Dalgety Agriculture Ltd; Notifying Party: Spillers Ltd; Notified Party: Thomas Hill & Company Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Decision / Decision on Notification for Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate granted; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Know How Licensing Agreement, Exclusive Licence, Intellectual Property Rights, Market Competition, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dalgety Agriculture Ltd
Notifying Party
Spillers Ltd
Notifying Party
Thomas Hill & Company Ltd
Notified Party
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Decision / Decision on Notification for Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Know-How Licensing Agreement between Dalgety Agriculture Ltd and Thomas Hill & Company Ltd restricts competition within the meaning of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- 2 Whether the agreement qualifies for a certificate under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The Competition Authority found that the Know-How Licensing Agreement did not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in the relevant market, given the insignificant market share of the licensee, the presence of effective competition, and the deletion of potentially restrictive clauses. Therefore, the agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
Certificate granted; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- Certificate issued stating the agreement dated 5 June 1989 does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment