Director of Public Prosecutions -v- Pires & Ors [2016] IECA 413 (21 December 2016)

Director of Public Prosecutions -v- Pires & Ors [2016] IECA 413 (21 December 2016)

The District Court judge erred in law by applying an objective standard to the use of handcuffs and failing to assess whether the arresting gardaí made a genuine, subjective assessment of necessity as required by the Supreme Court in Cullen. The High Court was correct to find that the arrests were not unlawful on this basis.

Citation
[2016] IECA 413
Parties
Prosecutor/respondent: The Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused/appellant: Cicero Pires; Accused/appellant: James Corrigan; Accused/appellant: Paul Gannon
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
21 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed
Legal Topics
Lawfulness of Arrest, Use of Force by Police, Handcuffing During Arrest, Appeal by Way of Case Stated, Precedent and Stare Decisis
Criminal Law Procedural Law Lawfulness of Arrest Use of Force by Police Handcuffing During Arrest Appeal by Way of Case Stated Precedent and Stare Decisis

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Director of Public Prosecutions

Prosecutor/respondent

Cicero Pires

Accused/appellant

James Corrigan

Accused/appellant

Paul Gannon

Accused/appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the use of handcuffs during arrest rendered the arrests unlawful
  2. 2 Whether the District Court judge misapplied the legal principles from DPP v. Cullen regarding handcuffing
  3. 3 Whether the High Court could review the District Court's findings on a point of law

Ratio Decidendi

The District Court judge erred in law by applying an objective standard to the use of handcuffs and failing to assess whether the arresting gardaí made a genuine, subjective assessment of necessity as required by the Supreme Court in Cullen. The High Court was correct to find that the arrests were not unlawful on this basis.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court decision affirmed

Orders

  • The arrests of the appellants were not unlawful.
  • District Court's findings set aside; convictions may proceed.