Clarke v. Member In Charge, Terenure Garda Station [2001] IESC 91; [2002] 2 ILRM 11 (1 November 2001)
Temporary absence from a Garda station for legitimate purposes, such as court attendance, does not terminate lawful detention under s.4 of the Criminal Justice Act 1984, provided the detainee remains in Garda custody. The High Court's order for release was incorrect and must be set aside.
- Citation
- [2002] 2 ILRM 11
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Philip Clarke; Respondent/appellant: Member in Charge of Terenure Garda Station
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (habeas Corpus) / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Lawfulness of Detention, Interpretation of Detention Statutes, Mootness of Appeals, Habeas Corpus Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Philip Clarke
Applicant/respondent
Member in Charge of Terenure Garda Station
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (habeas Corpus) / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether temporary removal of a detainee from a Garda station for court attendance renders detention unlawful under the Criminal Justice Act 1984
- 2 Whether the Supreme Court should entertain an appeal where the issue is moot
Ratio Decidendi
Temporary absence from a Garda station for legitimate purposes, such as court attendance, does not terminate lawful detention under s.4 of the Criminal Justice Act 1984, provided the detainee remains in Garda custody. The High Court's order for release was incorrect and must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the High Court set aside
- Conditional order of Habeas Corpus discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment