Guinness Ireland Group Ltd. / United Beverages Holdings Limited. [1998] IECA 512 (17th June, 1998)
The Authority determined that the relevant markets are the production of soft drinks and the wholesaling of packaged beer and soft drinks, with the geographic market being the State. The Authority found that the merger would have horizontal effects in these markets but that the combined market shares of GIG and UBH would not be sufficient to substantially lessen competition. The Authority also found that barriers to entry are low, the market remains competitive, and there is no evidence that the merger would result in exclusionary effects or abuse of dominance. Accordingly, the notified agreement does not infringe Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1998] IECA 512
- Parties
- Notifying Party / Acquirer: Guinness Ireland Group Limited; Target / Acquired Party: United Beverages Holdings Limited; Objector / Third Party: Irish Distillers Group plc
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Merger Notification / Decision on Notification Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate issued under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991; merger permitted.
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Market Definition, Dominance, Vertical Integration, Horizontal Effects, Barriers to Entry
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guinness Ireland Group Limited
Notifying Party / Acquirer
United Beverages Holdings Limited
Target / Acquired Party
Irish Distillers Group plc
Objector / Third Party
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Merger Notification / Decision on Notification Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the acquisition by Guinness Ireland Group Limited of the remaining shares in United Beverages Holdings Limited prevents, restricts or distorts competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- 2 Whether the relevant product and geographic markets are correctly defined for the purposes of competition analysis.
- 3 Whether the proposed merger would result in a substantial lessening of competition or abuse of dominance.
Ratio Decidendi
The Authority determined that the relevant markets are the production of soft drinks and the wholesaling of packaged beer and soft drinks, with the geographic market being the State. The Authority found that the merger would have horizontal effects in these markets but that the combined market shares of GIG and UBH would not be sufficient to substantially lessen competition. The Authority also found that barriers to entry are low, the market remains competitive, and there is no evidence that the merger would result in exclusionary effects or abuse of dominance. Accordingly, the notified agreement does not infringe Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991; merger permitted.
Orders
- The notified agreement is not prohibited by Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- A certificate is granted under Section 4(4) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment