ILBS/FNBS [1993] IECA 19 (9th June, 1993)

ILBS/FNBS [1993] IECA 19 (9th June, 1993)

The Authority found that the transfer of engagements would not have the effect or object of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition within the State, given the small market share of ILBS, the competitive nature of the relevant markets, and the presence of multiple competitors.

Citation
[1993] IECA 19
Parties
Transferor: Irish Life Building Society; Transferee: First National Building Society
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification / Decision on Notified Agreement
Outcome
Certificate granted; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Building Societies, Transfer of Engagements, Market Concentration, Competition Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Irish Life Building Society

Transferor

First National Building Society

Transferee

Procedural Posture

Competition Authority Notification / Decision on Notified Agreement

  1. 1 Whether the transfer of engagements between ILBS and FNBS constitutes an agreement that prevents, restricts, or distorts competition under Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.

Ratio Decidendi

The Authority found that the transfer of engagements would not have the effect or object of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition within the State, given the small market share of ILBS, the competitive nature of the relevant markets, and the presence of multiple competitors.

Court Disposition

Certificate granted; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.

Orders

  • The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement for the transfer of engagements of Irish Life Building Society to First National Building Society does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.