McHugh -v- DPP [2009] IESC 15 (24 February 2009)
The absence of the original CCTV footage, which is central to the prosecution's case and identification of the accused, creates a real risk to the fairness of the trial as the defence cannot test the identification evidence. Therefore, the trial should be prohibited.
- Citation
- [2009] IESC 15
- Parties
- Respondent/applicant: Donal McHugh; Appellant/respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed prohibiting trial
- Legal Topics
- Missing Evidence, Right to Fair Trial, Disclosure, Identification Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donal McHugh
Respondent/applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the absence of original CCTV footage creates a real risk of an unfair trial for the accused
- 2 Whether reliance on witness recollection and still photographs is sufficient for a fair trial
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of the original CCTV footage, which is central to the prosecution's case and identification of the accused, creates a real risk to the fairness of the trial as the defence cannot test the identification evidence. Therefore, the trial should be prohibited.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed prohibiting trial
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Order of the High Court affirmed prohibiting the trial of the respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment