Duff v. Minister for Agriculture and Food [1999] IEHC 140 (25th March, 1999)

Duff v. Minister for Agriculture and Food [1999] IEHC 140 (25th March, 1999)

The Minister's failure to establish a national reserve as required by Article 5 of Council Regulation EEC/857/84 was a mistake of law. This mistake prevented the lawful exercise of discretion to allocate additional quota to development farmers, including the plaintiffs, who suffered loss as a result. The plaintiffs are entitled to damages assessed by reference to the difference between the targeted production in their development plans and the quota actually allocated for 1983, subject to practical considerations and the extent to which the Minister would have filled that difference.

Citation
[1999] IEHC 140
Parties
Plaintiffs: Duff and others; Defendants: Minister for Agriculture and others
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Plenary Summons / High Court Assessment of Damages Following Supreme Court Remittal
Outcome
Preliminary issue determined; formula for assessment of damages established
Legal Topics
Mistake of Law, Legitimate Expectation, Damages Assessment, Implementation of EU Regulations, Discretionary Powers of Minister
Administrative Law European Union Law Tort Law Mistake of Law Legitimate Expectation Damages Assessment Implementation of EU Regulations Discretionary Powers of Minister

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Duff and others

Plaintiffs

Minister for Agriculture and others

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Plenary Summons / High Court Assessment of Damages Following Supreme Court Remittal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to additional milk quota under Article 3(1) of Council Regulation EEC/857/84
  2. 2 Whether the Minister's failure to establish a national reserve constituted a mistake of law giving rise to damages
  3. 3 What formula should be used to assess damages for loss of quota allocation

Ratio Decidendi

The Minister's failure to establish a national reserve as required by Article 5 of Council Regulation EEC/857/84 was a mistake of law. This mistake prevented the lawful exercise of discretion to allocate additional quota to development farmers, including the plaintiffs, who suffered loss as a result. The plaintiffs are entitled to damages assessed by reference to the difference between the targeted production in their development plans and the quota actually allocated for 1983, subject to practical considerations and the extent to which the Minister would have filled that difference.

Court Disposition

Preliminary issue determined; formula for assessment of damages established

Orders

  • Damages to be assessed based on the difference between targeted production in plaintiffs' development plans and quota actually allocated for 1983, subject to further quantification proceedings