Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC v Gibney & Anor (Approved) [2023] IEHC 462 (28 July 2023)
The respondent, as the registered owner of the charge under s.31 of the Registration of Title Act 1964, is entitled to possession. Clause 18 of the mortgage deed is irrelevant to the transfer of the mortgagee's interest and does not require two signatures for valid transfer. The court cannot go behind the Register absent fraud or mistake.
- Citation
- [2023] IEHC 462
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC; Defendant/appellant: Damian Gibney; Defendant/appellant: Irene Gibney
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Circuit Appeal (possession Proceedings) / High Court Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendants' appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage Possession, Assignment of Mortgage, Registration of Title, Unfair Contract Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mars Capital Finance Ireland DAC
Plaintiff/respondent
Damian Gibney
Defendant/appellant
Irene Gibney
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Circuit Appeal (possession Proceedings) / High Court Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of the mortgage charge from the original lender to assignees was valid under the mortgage deed
- 2 Whether clause 18 of the mortgage deed required two signatures for valid transfer
- 3 Whether clause 18 constituted an unfair contract term under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1995
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent, as the registered owner of the charge under s.31 of the Registration of Title Act 1964, is entitled to possession. Clause 18 of the mortgage deed is irrelevant to the transfer of the mortgagee's interest and does not require two signatures for valid transfer. The court cannot go behind the Register absent fraud or mistake.
Court Disposition
Defendants' appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed.
Orders
- Order for possession of property in favour of respondent affirmed.
- Stay on execution of possession order extended until final orders are made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment