Kantoher Food Products Ltd/Carton Brothers Ltd [1994] IECA 352 (7th September, 1994)

Kantoher Food Products Ltd/Carton Brothers Ltd [1994] IECA 352 (7th September, 1994)

The non-compete clause in the agreement was not justified as Cartons had already acquired the goodwill prior to the agreement, the restriction was excessive in duration and timing, and technical know-how considerations did not apply. The agreement was not intra-group at the relevant time. Therefore, the restriction offends Section 4(1) and does not qualify for a licence under Section 4(2).

Citation
[1994] IECA 352
Parties
Vendor: Kantoher Food Products Limited; Purchaser: Carton Brothers (Processing) Limited; Related Party: Carton Brothers Limited; Former Manager/purchaser of Shares: Donal Flynn; Former Parent of KFP: Kantoher Co-Operative Agriculture and Dairy Society Limited; Acquirer of KFP Assets: Kerry/Grove Group; Plaintiff in Related Litigation: Grove Turkeys Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence
Outcome
Refusal to issue certificate or grant licence
Legal Topics
Non Compete Clauses, Sale of Business, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Market Concentration, Goodwill Transfer

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kantoher Food Products Limited

Vendor

Carton Brothers (Processing) Limited

Purchaser

Carton Brothers Limited

Related Party

Donal Flynn

Former Manager/purchaser of Shares

Kantoher Co-Operative Agriculture and Dairy Society Limited

Former Parent of KFP

Kerry/Grove Group

Acquirer of KFP Assets

Grove Turkeys Limited

Plaintiff in Related Litigation

Procedural Posture

Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence

  1. 1 Whether the non-compete clause in the sale agreement offends Section 4(1) of the Competition Act 1991
  2. 2 Whether the agreement qualifies for a certificate or licence under Section 4(2)

Ratio Decidendi

The non-compete clause in the agreement was not justified as Cartons had already acquired the goodwill prior to the agreement, the restriction was excessive in duration and timing, and technical know-how considerations did not apply. The agreement was not intra-group at the relevant time. Therefore, the restriction offends Section 4(1) and does not qualify for a licence under Section 4(2).

Court Disposition

Refusal to issue certificate or grant licence

Orders

  • Refusal to issue certificate under Section 4(1) Competition Act 1991
  • Refusal to grant licence under Section 4(2) Competition Act 1991