Sedgwick Dineen/Legal and Commercial Insurances [1994] IECA 332 (10th June, 1994)
The five-year non-compete and non-solicitation clauses in the Asset Purchase Agreement exceed what is necessary to secure the transfer of goodwill and thus offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act. The one-year restriction on soliciting employees post-employment in the service agreements also exceeds what is necessary to protect proprietary interests and offends against Section 4(1). These restrictions are not indispensable and do not satisfy the requirements for a licence under Section 4(2).
- Citation
- [1994] IECA 332
- Parties
- Purchaser: Sedgwick Dineen Limited; Vendor: Legal and Commercial Insurances Limited; Covenantor: Paschal Butler; Covenantor: Kieran Halpin; Covenantor: Martin Murray; Covenantor: Henry Collier; Covenantor: Peter Lyons
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence
- Outcome
- Refusal to issue certificate or grant licence
- Legal Topics
- Non Compete Clauses, Sale of Business, Employment Covenants, Section 4(1) Competition Act, Section 4(2) Competition Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sedgwick Dineen Limited
Purchaser
Legal and Commercial Insurances Limited
Vendor
Paschal Butler
Covenantor
Kieran Halpin
Covenantor
Martin Murray
Covenantor
Henry Collier
Covenantor
Peter Lyons
Covenantor
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the non-compete and non-solicitation clauses in the Asset Purchase Agreement and service agreements offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act
- 2 Whether the restrictions are indispensable and satisfy the requirements for a licence under Section 4(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The five-year non-compete and non-solicitation clauses in the Asset Purchase Agreement exceed what is necessary to secure the transfer of goodwill and thus offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act. The one-year restriction on soliciting employees post-employment in the service agreements also exceeds what is necessary to protect proprietary interests and offends against Section 4(1). These restrictions are not indispensable and do not satisfy the requirements for a licence under Section 4(2).
Court Disposition
Refusal to issue certificate or grant licence
Orders
- Certificate refused under Section 4(1) of the Competition Act
- Licence refused under Section 4(2) of the Competition Act
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment