Nallen/O'Toole [1992] IECA 1 (2nd April, 1992)
The non-competition clause is not in breach of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 because it is limited to what is necessary for the transfer of goodwill, does not reduce the number of actual competitors, and does not restrict potential competition in the relevant market.
- Citation
- [1992] IECA 1
- Parties
- Purchaser: Thomas J. Nallen; Vendor: Edward O'Toole
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification Decision / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Non Competition Clause, Transfer of Business, Goodwill, Market Definition, Restraint of Trade
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas J. Nallen
Purchaser
Edward O'Toole
Vendor
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification Decision / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the non-competition clause in the agreement between Nallen and O'Toole breaches Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- 2 Whether the agreement prevents, restricts, or distorts competition in the relevant market
Ratio Decidendi
The non-competition clause is not in breach of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 because it is limited to what is necessary for the transfer of goodwill, does not reduce the number of actual competitors, and does not restrict potential competition in the relevant market.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement for the transfer of business interest between Nallen and O'Toole does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment