Coillte Teoranta / Coillte Allocation Scheme. [1998] IECA 527 (19th November, 1998)
As the notified agreement had expired before a decision could be made, issuing a certificate or licence would have no legal effect; therefore, there is no necessity to make such a decision.
- Citation
- [1998] IECA 527
- Parties
- Notifying Party: Coillte Teoranta; Counterparty: Customer sawmills (CAS participants)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification / Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence Under Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- File closed without decision on certificate or licence; no relief granted.
- Legal Topics
- Notification of Agreements, Certificates and Licences Under Competition Act, Retrospective Effect of Competition Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coillte Teoranta
Notifying Party
Customer sawmills (CAS participants)
Counterparty
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification / Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence Under Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Competition Authority should issue a certificate or licence for an expired agreement under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
As the notified agreement had expired before a decision could be made, issuing a certificate or licence would have no legal effect; therefore, there is no necessity to make such a decision.
Court Disposition
File closed without decision on certificate or licence; no relief granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment