O' Ceallaigh v An Bord Altranais [2011] IESC 50 (21 December 2011)
There was no cogent or rational link between the chairperson's employment at the same hospital as the expert witness and any risk of partiality. The mere fact of professional association, without more, does not establish objective bias. The failure to disclose the chairperson's employment did not amount to objective bias, as the facts were ultimately disclosed and fully argued. The reasonable observer would not apprehend bias in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [2011] IESC 50
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Ann O'Ceallaigh; Respondents: An Bord Altranais and the Fitness to Practise Committee of An Bord Altranais; Notice Party/respondent: The Chief Executive Officer of An Bord Altranais
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal of Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed - High Court order affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Objective Bias, Judicial Review, Fitness to Practise, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ann O'Ceallaigh
Applicant/appellant
An Bord Altranais and the Fitness to Practise Committee of An Bord Altranais
Respondents
The Chief Executive Officer of An Bord Altranais
Notice Party/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal of Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the chairperson of the Fitness to Practise Committee was objectively biased due to professional association with the Board's expert witness
- 2 Whether failure to disclose the chairperson's employment constituted objective bias
Ratio Decidendi
There was no cogent or rational link between the chairperson's employment at the same hospital as the expert witness and any risk of partiality. The mere fact of professional association, without more, does not establish objective bias. The failure to disclose the chairperson's employment did not amount to objective bias, as the facts were ultimately disclosed and fully argued. The reasonable observer would not apprehend bias in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed - High Court order affirmed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- High Court order refusing judicial review affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment