O' Ceallaigh v An Bord Altranais [2011] IESC 50 (21 December 2011)

O' Ceallaigh v An Bord Altranais [2011] IESC 50 (21 December 2011)

There was no cogent or rational link between the chairperson's employment at the same hospital as the expert witness and any risk of partiality. The mere fact of professional association, without more, does not establish objective bias. The failure to disclose the chairperson's employment did not amount to objective bias, as the facts were ultimately disclosed and fully argued. The reasonable observer would not apprehend bias in these circumstances.

Citation
[2011] IESC 50
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Ann O'Ceallaigh; Respondents: An Bord Altranais and the Fitness to Practise Committee of An Bord Altranais; Notice Party/respondent: The Chief Executive Officer of An Bord Altranais
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
21 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal of Judicial Review
Outcome
Appeal dismissed - High Court order affirmed
Legal Topics
Objective Bias, Judicial Review, Fitness to Practise, Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ann O'Ceallaigh

Applicant/appellant

An Bord Altranais and the Fitness to Practise Committee of An Bord Altranais

Respondents

The Chief Executive Officer of An Bord Altranais

Notice Party/respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal of Judicial Review

  1. 1 Whether the chairperson of the Fitness to Practise Committee was objectively biased due to professional association with the Board's expert witness
  2. 2 Whether failure to disclose the chairperson's employment constituted objective bias

Ratio Decidendi

There was no cogent or rational link between the chairperson's employment at the same hospital as the expert witness and any risk of partiality. The mere fact of professional association, without more, does not establish objective bias. The failure to disclose the chairperson's employment did not amount to objective bias, as the facts were ultimately disclosed and fully argued. The reasonable observer would not apprehend bias in these circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed - High Court order affirmed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • High Court order refusing judicial review affirmed