Weir Rodgers -v- The S.F. Trust Ltd [2005] IESC 2 (21 January 2005)

Weir Rodgers -v- The S.F. Trust Ltd [2005] IESC 2 (21 January 2005)

The occupier did not act with reckless disregard for the safety of the plaintiff as the danger of the cliff edge was obvious, and the law does not require warning notices or fencing for such natural features. The statutory threshold for liability was not met.

Citation
[2005] IESC 2
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Geraldine Weir-Rodgers; Defendant/appellant: The S. F. Trust Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
21 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; action dismissed.
Legal Topics
Occupiers' Liability, Recreational Users, Duty of Care, Reckless Disregard, Personal Injury

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geraldine Weir-Rodgers

Plaintiff/respondent

The S. F. Trust Limited

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court

  1. 1 Whether the occupier owed a duty to the plaintiff under section 4 of the Occupiers Liability Act, 1995
  2. 2 Whether the occupier acted with reckless disregard for the safety of the plaintiff
  3. 3 Whether a warning notice or fencing was required at the site of the accident

Ratio Decidendi

The occupier did not act with reckless disregard for the safety of the plaintiff as the danger of the cliff edge was obvious, and the law does not require warning notices or fencing for such natural features. The statutory threshold for liability was not met.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; action dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment of the High Court set aside
  • Plaintiff's action dismissed