Scaife -v- Falcon Leisure Group [2007] IESC 57 (04 December 2007)
The organiser of a package holiday is liable to the consumer for improper performance of contractual obligations by a service supplier abroad, judged by the standard of reasonable skill and care, not strict liability. The evidence established that the hotel failed to operate its safety system, resulting in foreseeable injury to the plaintiff. The High Court correctly applied the reasonable skill and care standard, and the organiser is liable under Section 20 of the Act of 1995.
- Citation
- [2007] IESC 57
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Mary Scaife; Defendant/appellant: Falcon Leisure Group (Overseas) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Contract (package Holiday) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Package Holidays Liability, Duty of Care, Implied Contractual Terms, Standard of Care, Transposition of EU Directives, Occupiers' Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Scaife
Plaintiff/respondent
Falcon Leisure Group (Overseas) Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Contract (package Holiday) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the organiser of a package holiday is liable for personal injuries caused by improper performance of services by a hotel abroad under the Package Holidays and Travel Trade Act 1995 and Directive 90/314/EEC
- 2 Whether the standard of care is strict liability or reasonable skill and care
- 3 Whether Irish or Spanish legal standards apply to the assessment of liability
Ratio Decidendi
The organiser of a package holiday is liable to the consumer for improper performance of contractual obligations by a service supplier abroad, judged by the standard of reasonable skill and care, not strict liability. The evidence established that the hotel failed to operate its safety system, resulting in foreseeable injury to the plaintiff. The High Court correctly applied the reasonable skill and care standard, and the organiser is liable under Section 20 of the Act of 1995.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The order of the High Court in favour of the plaintiff is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment