Trinity College Dublin v Kenny (Unapproved) [2020] IESC 77 (21 December 2020)

Trinity College Dublin v Kenny (Unapproved) [2020] IESC 77 (21 December 2020)

The High Court correctly exercised its discretion to order sale, as the evidence showed Mrs. Kenny would not be rendered homeless and could purchase alternative accommodation; however, given the advanced age of the Kennys and increased mortgage debt, immediate sale would now be oppressive. The order for sale is affirmed but stayed on conditions: the Donegal property must be marketed and sold within six months, proceeds paid to Trinity, and the stay on sale of Dartry continues until its sale or the death of the last surviving spouse, with Mrs. Kenny's equity in Dartry increased by her share of Donegal proceeds.

Citation
[2020] IESC 77
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: The Provost, Fellows and Scholars of the University of Dublin, Trinity College; Defendant/appellant: James Kenny; Defendant/appellant: Patricia Kenny
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
21 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order for Sale
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; order for sale affirmed with stay and conditions.
Legal Topics
Partition and Sale, Judgment Mortgages, Co Ownership, Family Home Protection, Equitable Remedies
Property Law Equity Civil Procedure Partition and Sale Judgment Mortgages Co Ownership Family Home Protection Equitable Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 35 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Provost, Fellows and Scholars of the University of Dublin, Trinity College

Plaintiff/respondent

James Kenny

Defendant/appellant

Patricia Kenny

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order for Sale

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court correctly exercised discretion to order sale in lieu of partition of the Dartry premises under the Partition Acts 1868 and 1876
  2. 2 Whether changed circumstances (age, increased mortgage debt) justify a different outcome on appeal
  3. 3 Whether the interests of the non-debtor co-owner (Mrs. Kenny) outweigh the judgment creditor's right to enforce

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court correctly exercised its discretion to order sale, as the evidence showed Mrs. Kenny would not be rendered homeless and could purchase alternative accommodation; however, given the advanced age of the Kennys and increased mortgage debt, immediate sale would now be oppressive. The order for sale is affirmed but stayed on conditions: the Donegal property must be marketed and sold within six months, proceeds paid to Trinity, and the stay on sale of Dartry continues until its sale or the death of the last surviving spouse, with Mrs. Kenny's equity in Dartry increased by her share of Donegal proceeds.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; order for sale affirmed with stay and conditions.

Orders

  • Order for sale of Dartry premises affirmed.
  • Stay on sale granted, conditional on Donegal property being marketed and sold within six months, with proceeds paid to Trinity.