Re: Hickey (a debtor) No.3 [2018] IEHC 313 (31 May 2018)
The court held that, to avoid an absurd result and to give effect to the legislative intent of the Personal Insolvency Act, the protection of a protective certificate continues pending the determination of an application under s. 115A, even if the application is made outside the currency of the certificate. However, in this case, the debtor had the benefit of a protective certificate until 18 January 2017, and was therefore not eligible to apply for a further certificate on 3 November 2017, as less than 12 months had elapsed. The application failed for non-compliance with the eligibility criteria under s. 91.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 313
- Parties
- Debtor: Michael Hickey; Objecting Creditor: KBC Bank Ireland Plc
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Insolvency Application / Preliminary Objection to Eligibility Under S. 91 of the Personal Insolvency Act 2012
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Insolvency Arrangement, Protective Certificate, Statutory Interpretation, Section 115 a Personal Insolvency Act, Eligibility Criteria
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Hickey
Debtor
KBC Bank Ireland Plc
Objecting Creditor
Procedural Posture
Personal Insolvency Application / Preliminary Objection to Eligibility Under S. 91 of the Personal Insolvency Act 2012
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a debtor continues to benefit from a protective certificate pending determination of an application under s. 115A when the application is made outside the currency of the certificate
- 2 Whether the debtor satisfied the eligibility criteria under s. 91 of the Personal Insolvency Act 2012
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, to avoid an absurd result and to give effect to the legislative intent of the Personal Insolvency Act, the protection of a protective certificate continues pending the determination of an application under s. 115A, even if the application is made outside the currency of the certificate. However, in this case, the debtor had the benefit of a protective certificate until 18 January 2017, and was therefore not eligible to apply for a further certificate on 3 November 2017, as less than 12 months had elapsed. The application failed for non-compliance with the eligibility criteria under s. 91.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application under s. 115A is not properly before the court and is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment