Re: Taffe & The Personal Insolvency Acts 2012- 2015 [2018] IEHC 468 (03 August 2018)
The debtor is not necessarily bound by the description of principal private residence in the PIA for the purposes of a s.115A application. The court must determine, based on evidence at the substantive hearing, where the debtor ordinarily resides. The relevant debt requirement under s.115A must be established by evidence, and the court is not precluded from considering affidavit or other evidence to resolve discrepancies between the PIA and the PFS. Any discrepancy must be fully explained by the debtor and/or practitioner, and the objecting creditor may adduce contrary evidence. The PIA remains capable of taking effect if the court is satisfied as to the true principal private residence...
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 468
- Parties
- Debtor: Donal Taaffe; Creditor/objector: Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland; Creditor: Revenue Commissioners; Creditor/objector: Pentire Property Finance DAC; Creditor: IG Markets Ltd.; Creditor: Cabot Financial Ireland Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Insolvency Act Application (s.115 A) / Preliminary Issue Determination Prior to Substantive S.115 a Hearing
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue resolved: the debtor is not bound by the PIA's description of principal private residence for s.115A purposes; matter to proceed to substantive hearing with evidence required on the true principal private residence and explanation for discrepancy.
- Legal Topics
- Personal Insolvency Arrangement, Principal Private Residence, Relevant Debt Definition, Good Faith Obligation, Court Jurisdiction Under S.115 a
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donal Taaffe
Debtor
Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland
Creditor/objector
Revenue Commissioners
Creditor
Pentire Property Finance DAC
Creditor/objector
IG Markets Ltd.
Creditor
Cabot Financial Ireland Ltd.
Creditor
Procedural Posture
Personal Insolvency Act Application (s.115 A) / Preliminary Issue Determination Prior to Substantive S.115 a Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the debtor is bound by the description of principal private residence in the PIA for the purposes of s.115A application
- 2 Whether extraneous evidence can be admitted to establish the debtor's principal private residence under the Personal Insolvency Acts
- 3 Whether a discrepancy between the PFS and PIA as to principal private residence affects the court's jurisdiction under s.115A
Ratio Decidendi
The debtor is not necessarily bound by the description of principal private residence in the PIA for the purposes of a s.115A application. The court must determine, based on evidence at the substantive hearing, where the debtor ordinarily resides. The relevant debt requirement under s.115A must be established by evidence, and the court is not precluded from considering affidavit or other evidence to resolve discrepancies between the PIA and the PFS. Any discrepancy must be fully explained by the debtor and/or practitioner, and the objecting creditor may adduce contrary evidence. The PIA remains capable of taking effect if the court is satisfied as to the true principal private residence...
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue resolved: the debtor is not bound by the PIA's description of principal private residence for s.115A purposes; matter to proceed to substantive hearing with evidence required on the true principal private residence and explanation for discrepancy.
Orders
- Debtor and/or personal insolvency practitioner to provide affidavit evidence explaining the discrepancy between the PIA and other documents regarding principal private residence.
- Objecting creditor (Bank of Ireland) permitted to adduce evidence on the issue at the substantive s.115A hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment