Kirwan v Personal Insolvency Acts 2021-2015 (Approved) [2021] IEHC 327 (13 May 2021)
The court holds that while s.115(2)(a) uses the word 'shall', it is directory, not strictly mandatory. The court retains jurisdiction to refuse approval of a PIA that, despite meeting statutory criteria, is fundamentally unfair or contrary to the statutory intendment of the Act. However, this jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases. In this case, the arrangement meets all statutory criteria, has unanimous creditor support, and the debtor, fully advised, accepts the risks. There is no basis to override the wishes of the debtor and creditors. The PIA is approved.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 327
- Parties
- Debtor: Esther Kirwan; Secured Creditor: Start Mortgages DAC; Unsecured Creditor: Allied Irish Banks plc; Unsecured Creditor: Revenue Commissioners; Personal Insolvency Practitioner: Mitchell O’Brien
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Circuit Appeal Under Personal Insolvency Acts 2012 2015, S.115 / Appeal From Circuit Court Refusal to Approve Personal Insolvency Arrangement
- Outcome
- Personal Insolvency Arrangement approved; appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Personal Insolvency Arrangement, Court Approval of Insolvency Arrangements, Statutory Interpretation of Mandatory and Directory Provisions, Debtor Protection, Mortgage Restructuring
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Kirwan
Debtor
Start Mortgages DAC
Secured Creditor
Allied Irish Banks plc
Unsecured Creditor
Revenue Commissioners
Unsecured Creditor
Mitchell O’Brien
Personal Insolvency Practitioner
Procedural Posture
Circuit Appeal Under Personal Insolvency Acts 2012 2015, S.115 / Appeal From Circuit Court Refusal to Approve Personal Insolvency Arrangement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court is obliged to approve a Personal Insolvency Arrangement under s.115 where statutory criteria are met
- 2 Whether the court may refuse approval on grounds outside s.115(2)(a) criteria
- 3 Whether the arrangement is unfair or contrary to the statutory intendment of the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The court holds that while s.115(2)(a) uses the word 'shall', it is directory, not strictly mandatory. The court retains jurisdiction to refuse approval of a PIA that, despite meeting statutory criteria, is fundamentally unfair or contrary to the statutory intendment of the Act. However, this jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly and only in exceptional cases. In this case, the arrangement meets all statutory criteria, has unanimous creditor support, and the debtor, fully advised, accepts the risks. There is no basis to override the wishes of the debtor and creditors. The PIA is approved.
Court Disposition
Personal Insolvency Arrangement approved; appeal allowed.
Orders
- Order confirming the coming into effect of the Personal Insolvency Arrangement under s.115 of the Personal Insolvency Acts 2012-2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment