Doe & ors v Commissioner of An Garda Siochana & ors (Approved) [2025] IESC 44 (07 November 2025)
The constitutional right to name and identity is protected as part of the dignity of the individual and the protection of the person, but this right is to have authentic civil registration details recorded. The State's interest in the authenticity of these records outweighs the appellants' claims absent very clear and cogent evidence of a direct threat to life or person, which was not established on the facts.
- Citation
- [2025] IESC 44
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Robert Doe; Plaintiff/appellant: Jane Doe; Plaintiff/appellant: Alan Doe (a minor suing by his next friend Jane Doe); Plaintiff/appellant: Brendan Doe (a minor suing by and next friend Jane Doe); Plaintiff/appellant: Ciara Doe (a minor suing next friend Jane Doe); Plaintiff/appellant: Darren Doe (a minor suing by his next friend Jane Doe); Defendant/respondent: The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána; Defendant/respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality; Defendant/respondent: Ireland; Defendant/respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Identity Rights, Civil Registration Authenticity, State Obligations to Witnesses, Unenumerated/derived Constitutional Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Doe
Plaintiff/appellant
Jane Doe
Plaintiff/appellant
Alan Doe (a minor suing by his next friend Jane Doe)
Plaintiff/appellant
Brendan Doe (a minor suing by and next friend Jane Doe)
Plaintiff/appellant
Ciara Doe (a minor suing next friend Jane Doe)
Plaintiff/appellant
Darren Doe (a minor suing by his next friend Jane Doe)
Plaintiff/appellant
The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
Defendant/respondent
The Minister for Justice and Equality
Defendant/respondent
Ireland
Defendant/respondent
The Attorney General
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State is constitutionally obliged to provide altered birth and marriage certificates to participants in the Witness Security Programme
- 2 Whether the failure to provide such documents infringes constitutional rights to name and identity
Ratio Decidendi
The constitutional right to name and identity is protected as part of the dignity of the individual and the protection of the person, but this right is to have authentic civil registration details recorded. The State's interest in the authenticity of these records outweighs the appellants' claims absent very clear and cogent evidence of a direct threat to life or person, which was not established on the facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no constitutional obligation on the State to provide altered birth or marriage certificates in these circumstances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment