Crean v Harty & Ors (Approved) [2020] IECA 364 (22 December 2020)
Section 13(1)(b) of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 mandates that defendants in personal injuries actions provide full and detailed particulars of each denial in their defence. Where a denial, though negative in form, is in substance a positive assertion (such as that informed consent was obtained), particulars must be provided. The defendants' refusal to provide particulars was contrary to the statutory obligation, and the plaintiff is entitled to such particulars to know the case he must meet at trial.
- Citation
- [2020] IECA 364
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Daniel Crean; Defendant/respondent: James Harty; Defendant/respondent: Heath Service Executive; Defendant/respondent: South Infirmary - Victoria Hospital Cork Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injuries Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision Refusing to Order Further and Better Particulars
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. High Court order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings, Particulars of Defence, Informed Consent, Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004, Disclosure Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Crean
Plaintiff/appellant
James Harty
Defendant/respondent
Heath Service Executive
Defendant/respondent
South Infirmary - Victoria Hospital Cork Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision Refusing to Order Further and Better Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 13(1)(b) of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 requires defendants in personal injuries actions to provide full and detailed particulars of a denial pleaded in their defence, specifically regarding informed consent.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 13(1)(b) of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 mandates that defendants in personal injuries actions provide full and detailed particulars of each denial in their defence. Where a denial, though negative in form, is in substance a positive assertion (such as that informed consent was obtained), particulars must be provided. The defendants' refusal to provide particulars was contrary to the statutory obligation, and the plaintiff is entitled to such particulars to know the case he must meet at trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. High Court order set aside.
Orders
- Order directing each defendant to provide the further and better particulars of their respective defences as sought by the plaintiff's solicitors' letters dated 15 and 17 August 2018.
- Plaintiff awarded costs of the appeal and the High Court application, subject to a stay pending further application if desired.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment