Shannon v Shannon & Anor (Approved) [2024] IEHC 291 (14 May 2024)
The defendants' claim to adverse possession fails as the required 12-year period was not met, and the plaintiff continuously asserted his title. All other defences have been repeatedly rejected in prior litigation, and the defendants have no legal or equitable interest in the property. The Circuit Court order granting possession to the plaintiff is affirmed.
- Citation
- [2024] IEHC 291
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: John Shannon; Defendant/appellant: Elizabeth Shannon; Defendant/appellant: Gwendoline Shannon
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Circuit Appeal (possession Proceedings) / High Court Appeal From Circuit Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Property, Adverse Possession, Costs of Litigation, Abuse of Process, Isaac Wunder Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Shannon
Plaintiff/respondent
Elizabeth Shannon
Defendant/appellant
Gwendoline Shannon
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Circuit Appeal (possession Proceedings) / High Court Appeal From Circuit Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants have any legal or equitable interest in the property registered to the plaintiff
- 2 Whether the defendants can claim adverse possession of the property
- 3 Whether the repeated litigation by the defendants constitutes an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants' claim to adverse possession fails as the required 12-year period was not met, and the plaintiff continuously asserted his title. All other defences have been repeatedly rejected in prior litigation, and the defendants have no legal or equitable interest in the property. The Circuit Court order granting possession to the plaintiff is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed.
Orders
- Plaintiff declared owner of the property at Folio SL15115.
- Defendants have no interest in the property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment