Fennell v Slevin & Ors (Approved) [2023] IECA 177 (12 July 2023)

Fennell v Slevin & Ors (Approved) [2023] IECA 177 (12 July 2023)

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's grant of interlocutory injunctive relief to the receiver. The receiver was validly appointed by the registered owner of the charge, the transfer of the loans was valid and properly evidenced, the demand letters were effective, the proceedings were not statute barred, and the documentary evidence was admissible. The balance of convenience and justice favoured granting the injunction to secure and manage the properties pending trial. The defendants' arguments regarding assignment, stamp duty, and hearsay were rejected.

Citation
[2023] IECA 177
Parties
Respondent/plaintiff: Ken Fennell; Appellant/defendant: Denis Slevin; Appellant/defendant: Danny McMenamin; Appellant/defendant: Siobhan Gallagher
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
12 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal (interlocutory Injunction) / Judgment on Appeal From High Court Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court orders affirmed.
Legal Topics
Receivership, Mortgage Enforcement, Interlocutory Injunctions, Assignment of Loans, Stamp Duty on Instruments, Hearsay in Interlocutory Applications, Statute of Limitations, Registration of Charges
Property Law Banking Law Civil Procedure Receivership Mortgage Enforcement Interlocutory Injunctions Assignment of Loans Stamp Duty on Instruments +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ken Fennell

Respondent/plaintiff

Denis Slevin

Appellant/defendant

Danny McMenamin

Appellant/defendant

Siobhan Gallagher

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (interlocutory Injunction) / Judgment on Appeal From High Court Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in granting interlocutory injunctive relief to the receiver over mortgaged properties
  2. 2 Whether the receiver was validly appointed and entitled to possession and income of the properties
  3. 3 Whether the transfer of loans and securities to Promontoria (Finn) Limited was valid and properly evidenced

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's grant of interlocutory injunctive relief to the receiver. The receiver was validly appointed by the registered owner of the charge, the transfer of the loans was valid and properly evidenced, the demand letters were effective, the proceedings were not statute barred, and the documentary evidence was admissible. The balance of convenience and justice favoured granting the injunction to secure and manage the properties pending trial. The defendants' arguments regarding assignment, stamp duty, and hearsay were rejected.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court orders affirmed.

Orders

  • Interlocutory injunction restraining defendants from impeding receiver's possession, securing, and collection of income from the properties pending trial affirmed.
  • Defendants to deliver up keys, security devices, and title documents to the receiver pending trial.