Harris -v- Quigley & anor [2005] IESC 79 (01 December 2005)
The Revenue Commissioners are not lawfully entitled to retain overpaid tax pending the outcome of a case stated to the High Court; section 934(6) requires effect to be given to the Appeal Commissioners’ determination, and absent statutory prohibition, the taxpayer has a common law right to restitution of overpaid tax.
- Citation
- [2005] IESC 79
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Robert Harris; Defendant/appellant: J. J. Quigley; Defendant/appellant: Liam J. Irwin
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Refund of Overpaid Tax, Interpretation of Tax Statutes, Common Law Restitution, Schedule E and Schedule D Taxpayers, Capital Allowances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Harris
Plaintiff/respondent
J. J. Quigley
Defendant/appellant
Liam J. Irwin
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Revenue Commissioners must refund overpaid tax pending outcome of a case stated to the High Court
- 2 Whether statutory provisions preclude a common law claim for refund
- 3 Interpretation of section 934(6) of the Taxes Consolidation Act, 1997
Ratio Decidendi
The Revenue Commissioners are not lawfully entitled to retain overpaid tax pending the outcome of a case stated to the High Court; section 934(6) requires effect to be given to the Appeal Commissioners’ determination, and absent statutory prohibition, the taxpayer has a common law right to restitution of overpaid tax.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed.
Orders
- Revenue Commissioners must refund €9,136,776.59 to Harris pending outcome of case stated.
- Interest to be paid in accordance with section 865A of the Taxes Consolidation Act, 1997.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment