O'Mara & Anor v. Morrison [2003] IESC 53 (13 October 2003)

O'Mara & Anor v. Morrison [2003] IESC 53 (13 October 2003)

The proposed works to widen the driveway constituted a breach of the restrictive covenants as they fell outside the expressly permitted development and substantially altered the nature and privacy of the property, which the covenants were intended to protect.

Citation
[2003] IESC 53
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Alphonsus O'Mara; Plaintiff/respondent: Claudia O'Mara; Defendant/appellant: Van Morrison
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 October 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Restrictive Covenants, Easements, Injunctions, Planning Permission

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alphonsus O'Mara

Plaintiff/respondent

Claudia O'Mara

Plaintiff/respondent

Van Morrison

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court

  1. 1 Whether proposed works to widen a driveway constituted a breach of restrictive covenants
  2. 2 Whether planning permission was required for the works
  3. 3 Whether the works constituted trespass or interference with rights of way

Ratio Decidendi

The proposed works to widen the driveway constituted a breach of the restrictive covenants as they fell outside the expressly permitted development and substantially altered the nature and privacy of the property, which the covenants were intended to protect.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • High Court order affirmed
  • No alteration to the terms of the High Court order as a result of the subsequent refusal by An Bord Pleanála