O'Mara & Anor v. Morrison [2003] IESC 53 (13 October 2003)
The proposed works to widen the driveway constituted a breach of the restrictive covenants as they fell outside the expressly permitted development and substantially altered the nature and privacy of the property, which the covenants were intended to protect.
- Citation
- [2003] IESC 53
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Alphonsus O'Mara; Plaintiff/respondent: Claudia O'Mara; Defendant/appellant: Van Morrison
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Easements, Injunctions, Planning Permission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alphonsus O'Mara
Plaintiff/respondent
Claudia O'Mara
Plaintiff/respondent
Van Morrison
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposed works to widen a driveway constituted a breach of restrictive covenants
- 2 Whether planning permission was required for the works
- 3 Whether the works constituted trespass or interference with rights of way
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed works to widen the driveway constituted a breach of the restrictive covenants as they fell outside the expressly permitted development and substantially altered the nature and privacy of the property, which the covenants were intended to protect.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- High Court order affirmed
- No alteration to the terms of the High Court order as a result of the subsequent refusal by An Bord Pleanála
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment