Power Supermarkets/Pat Owens [1994] IECA 316 (21st April, 1994)
The restrictive user clause in the sale agreement does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition, and is pro-competitive as it enables the development of additional retail units.
- Citation
- [1994] IECA 316
- Parties
- Vendor: Power Supermarkets Ltd; Purchaser: Pat Owens
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate issued that the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Sale of Land, Shopping Centre Development, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Power Supermarkets Ltd
Vendor
Pat Owens
Purchaser
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the restrictive user clause in the sale agreement offends Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The restrictive user clause in the sale agreement does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition, and is pro-competitive as it enables the development of additional retail units.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued that the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement between Power Supermarkets Ltd and Pat Owens in relation to the sale of land at Deal Yard Lane, Mallow, Co. Cork does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment