D.P.P. v. Heaphy [1999] IEHC 98 (9th February, 1999)

D.P.P. v. Heaphy [1999] IEHC 98 (9th February, 1999)

The information sworn by Garda Sheedy was sufficiently detailed to allow the Peace Commissioner to be personally satisfied of the grounds for issuing the search warrant. There is no requirement for the Peace Commissioner to be present in court to give evidence of his state of mind if sufficient material was before him. The trial judge must ultimately decide on the admissibility of the evidence, but on a prima facie basis, the warrant was validly issued.

Citation
[1999] IEHC 98
Parties
Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Accused: John Heaphy
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Consultative Case Stated / High Court Determination on Questions of Law From District Court
Outcome
Questions answered as follows: (i) Yes, on a prima facie basis; (ii) No; (iii) and (iv) do not arise.
Legal Topics
Search Warrants, Admissibility of Evidence, Misuse of Drugs, Constitutional Rights, Judicial Review
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Search Warrants Admissibility of Evidence Misuse of Drugs Constitutional Rights Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Prosecutor

John Heaphy

Accused

Procedural Posture

Consultative Case Stated / High Court Determination on Questions of Law From District Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether evidence given by Garda Sheedy was sufficient to prove prima facie the valid issue of the search warrant
  2. 2 Whether the Peace Commissioner must give evidence on oath to prove his enquiry
  3. 3 Whether an invalid warrant renders evidence inadmissible due to breach of constitutional rights

Ratio Decidendi

The information sworn by Garda Sheedy was sufficiently detailed to allow the Peace Commissioner to be personally satisfied of the grounds for issuing the search warrant. There is no requirement for the Peace Commissioner to be present in court to give evidence of his state of mind if sufficient material was before him. The trial judge must ultimately decide on the admissibility of the evidence, but on a prima facie basis, the warrant was validly issued.

Court Disposition

Questions answered as follows: (i) Yes, on a prima facie basis; (ii) No; (iii) and (iv) do not arise.