Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (23 February 2012)
Section 29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act, 1939 (as inserted by s. 5 of the Criminal Law Act, 1976) is repugnant to the Constitution insofar as it permits a search of a dwelling on foot of a warrant issued by a Garda officer involved in the investigation, rather than by an independent person, thereby failing to provide the necessary impartiality and protection required by Article 40.5 of the Constitution.
- Citation
- [2012] IESC 11
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Ali Charaf Damache; Respondents: Director of Public Prosecutions, Ireland, and the Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; declaration granted of unconstitutionality of s. 29(1) as applied
- Legal Topics
- Search Warrants, Constitutionality of Legislation, Inviolability of Dwelling, Judicial Review, Proportionality, Administrative Acts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ali Charaf Damache
Applicant/appellant
Director of Public Prosecutions, Ireland, and the Attorney General
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s. 29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act, 1939 (as inserted by s. 5 of the Criminal Law Act, 1976) is repugnant to the Constitution for permitting a search warrant to be issued by a Garda officer involved in the investigation, rather than an independent person
- 2 Whether the issuance of a search warrant by a non-independent person violates Article 40.5 of the Constitution (inviolability of the dwelling)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act, 1939 (as inserted by s. 5 of the Criminal Law Act, 1976) is repugnant to the Constitution insofar as it permits a search of a dwelling on foot of a warrant issued by a Garda officer involved in the investigation, rather than by an independent person, thereby failing to provide the necessary impartiality and protection required by Article 40.5 of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; declaration granted of unconstitutionality of s. 29(1) as applied
Orders
- Declaration that s. 29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act, 1939 (as inserted by s. 5 of the Criminal Law Act, 1976) is repugnant to the Constitution as it permitted a search of the appellant’s home on foot of a warrant not issued by an independent person.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment