M.B. v P.D. (Approved) [2023] IEHC 561 (13 June 2023)

M.B. v P.D. (Approved) [2023] IEHC 561 (13 June 2023)

There is no legal basis for the proposition that renunciation of a grant of representation suspends the six-month limitation period under s. 117(6) of the Succession Act, 1965. The time-bar is jurisdictional and cannot be avoided by estoppel or by the conduct of the defendant. As the Co-Plaintiff failed to issue proceedings within the prescribed period, her joinder is not permitted and the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
[2023] IEHC 561
Parties
Plaintiff / Appellant: M. B.; Defendant / Respondent: P. D.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Appeal From Circuit Court Refusal to Join Co Plaintiff
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; application for relief refused.
Legal Topics
Section 117 Succession Act 1965, Limitation Periods, Jurisdiction, Joinder of Parties, Estoppel
Succession Law Civil Procedure Section 117 Succession Act 1965 Limitation Periods Jurisdiction Joinder of Parties Estoppel

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M. B.

Plaintiff / Appellant

P. D.

Defendant / Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Appeal From Circuit Court Refusal to Join Co Plaintiff

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether renunciation of a grant of representation suspends the six-month limitation period under s. 117(6) of the Succession Act, 1965
  2. 2 Whether a defendant can be estopped from relying on the time-bar under s. 117(6) due to representations made regarding renunciation
  3. 3 Whether the Co-Plaintiff can be joined to the proceedings despite not issuing within the limitation period

Ratio Decidendi

There is no legal basis for the proposition that renunciation of a grant of representation suspends the six-month limitation period under s. 117(6) of the Succession Act, 1965. The time-bar is jurisdictional and cannot be avoided by estoppel or by the conduct of the defendant. As the Co-Plaintiff failed to issue proceedings within the prescribed period, her joinder is not permitted and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; application for relief refused.

Orders

  • Refusal to join Co-Plaintiff to proceedings
  • Dismissal of appeal against Circuit Court decision