Freeman -v- Bank of Scotland PLC & ors [2016] IESC 14 (15 March 2016)
The Bank of Scotland PLC, as successor to BOSI by cross-border merger, was contractually entitled to appoint a receiver over the appellants' properties notwithstanding non-registration as owner of the charge; the securitisation and non-registration did not invalidate the appointment or the charge; any potential title issues for purchasers do not affect the validity of the receiver's appointment or the charge.
- Citation
- [2016] IESC 14
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Anthony Freeman; Plaintiff/appellant: Miriam Freeman; Defendant/respondent: Bank of Scotland PLC; Defendant/respondent: Simon Davidson; Defendant/respondent: Llyod Daly & Associates Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Securitisation, Mortgage Enforcement, Appointment of Receiver, Registration of Charges, Cross Border Merger, Non Est Factum
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Freeman
Plaintiff/appellant
Miriam Freeman
Plaintiff/appellant
Bank of Scotland PLC
Defendant/respondent
Simon Davidson
Defendant/respondent
Llyod Daly & Associates Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bank of Scotland PLC was entitled to appoint a receiver over the appellants' properties following a cross-border merger and securitisation of loans.
- 2 Whether non-registration of the Bank as owner of the charge invalidated the appointment of the receiver or the enforcement of the charge.
- 3 Whether the securitisation of the loans affected the Bank's entitlement to enforce the charge.
Ratio Decidendi
The Bank of Scotland PLC, as successor to BOSI by cross-border merger, was contractually entitled to appoint a receiver over the appellants' properties notwithstanding non-registration as owner of the charge; the securitisation and non-registration did not invalidate the appointment or the charge; any potential title issues for purchasers do not affect the validity of the receiver's appointment or the charge.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed.
- Bank to take steps to register as owner of the charge to enable registration of transferees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment