Collins -v- Minister for Finance, Ireland and the Attorney General [2016] IESC 73 (16 December 2016)
The issuance of promissory notes in 2010 constituted the provision of financial support at the time of issuance, not at each payment, and was within the statutory powers as extended by Ministerial order. The Act of 2008, as amended, did not unconstitutionally delegate Dáil Éireann's financial authority, as the constitutional and statutory procedures for appropriation and reporting were complied with. There was no unlawful abdication of parliamentary control.
- Citation
- [2016] IESC 73
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Joan Collins; Defendants/respondents: Minister for Finance, Ireland and the Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional and Administrative Law Challenge / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Separation of Powers, Delegation of Legislative Authority, Financial Support to Credit Institutions, Ultra Vires Acts, Appropriation of Public Funds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joan Collins
Plaintiff/appellant
Minister for Finance, Ireland and the Attorney General
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Constitutional and Administrative Law Challenge / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Government exceeded statutory powers under the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008 in issuing promissory notes to IBRC and EBS
- 2 Whether the Oireachtas acted unconstitutionally by passing the Act of 2008 without a financial cap, thereby abdicating parliamentary control over public expenditure
Ratio Decidendi
The issuance of promissory notes in 2010 constituted the provision of financial support at the time of issuance, not at each payment, and was within the statutory powers as extended by Ministerial order. The Act of 2008, as amended, did not unconstitutionally delegate Dáil Éireann's financial authority, as the constitutional and statutory procedures for appropriation and reporting were complied with. There was no unlawful abdication of parliamentary control.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The orders of the High Court dismissing the plaintiff's claim are affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment