McGuinn v The Commissioner of an Garda Siochana & ors [2011] IESC 33 (28 July 2011)
The Supreme Court held that special circumstances existed at the time of default due to the miscommunication between solicitors, which justified setting aside the judgment. Although the defendants' subsequent delay was inordinate and inexcusable, it did not cause prejudice to the plaintiff or prevent a fair trial. The interests of justice required that the case be heard on its merits, and the defendants were permitted to file a defence, but only on terms that they pay the plaintiff’s costs up to the date of trial.
- Citation
- [2011] IESC 33
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Joseph McGuinn; Defendant/appellant: The Commissioner of an Garda Siochana; Defendant/appellant: The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform; Defendant/appellant: Ireland; Defendant/appellant: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision on Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Judgment in Default of Defence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; judgment in default set aside; defendants granted liberty to file defence on terms as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgment, Special Circumstances Under Order 27 Rule 14(2), Delay in Litigation, Right to Fair Hearing, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joseph McGuinn
Plaintiff/respondent
The Commissioner of an Garda Siochana
Defendant/appellant
The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
Defendant/appellant
Ireland
Defendant/appellant
The Attorney General
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Decision on Interlocutory Application to Set Aside Judgment in Default of Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special circumstances existed at the time of default to justify setting aside judgment under Order 27 Rule 14(2)
- 2 Whether inordinate and inexcusable delay disentitles the defendants to relief
- 3 How the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 affects the court's discretion in procedural matters
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that special circumstances existed at the time of default due to the miscommunication between solicitors, which justified setting aside the judgment. Although the defendants' subsequent delay was inordinate and inexcusable, it did not cause prejudice to the plaintiff or prevent a fair trial. The interests of justice required that the case be heard on its merits, and the defendants were permitted to file a defence, but only on terms that they pay the plaintiff’s costs up to the date of trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; judgment in default set aside; defendants granted liberty to file defence on terms as to costs.
Orders
- Judgment in default of defence set aside
- Defendants granted liberty to file defence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment