Development Capital Corporation Ltd/Direct Marketing Technologies Ltd/Shareholder Agreement [1997] IECA 479 (13th March, 1997)
The notified share subscription agreement, as amended by waivers limiting the duration of non-compete and non-solicit clauses, does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 because the restrictions are now limited to periods and scope generally accepted as necessary to protect legitimate business interests and do not prevent, restrict, or distort competition.
- Citation
- [1997] IECA 479
- Parties
- Notifier/subscriber: Development Capital Corporation Ltd; Company: Direct Marketing Technologies Group Ltd (formerly Cartagena Ltd); Covenantor/shareholder/director: Matthew McNamara; Covenantor/shareholder/director: Anthony O'Donovan Johnstone; Covenantor/shareholder/director: James McGuirk
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate issued; notified arrangements do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Shareholder Agreements, Non Compete Clauses, Non Solicitation Clauses, Venture Capital Investment, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Development Capital Corporation Ltd
Notifier/subscriber
Direct Marketing Technologies Group Ltd (formerly Cartagena Ltd)
Company
Matthew McNamara
Covenantor/shareholder/director
Anthony O'Donovan Johnstone
Covenantor/shareholder/director
James McGuirk
Covenantor/shareholder/director
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision on Notification Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notified share subscription agreement and related covenants offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 by preventing, restricting, or distorting competition
Ratio Decidendi
The notified share subscription agreement, as amended by waivers limiting the duration of non-compete and non-solicit clauses, does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 because the restrictions are now limited to periods and scope generally accepted as necessary to protect legitimate business interests and do not prevent, restrict, or distort competition.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued; notified arrangements do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- Certificate issued that the Share Subscription Agreement, as amended, does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment