Group 91 Architects Ltd/Shareholders Agreement [1995] IECA 433 (20th October, 1995)
The notified shareholders agreement and Deed of Covenant do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 because the restrictions are necessary for the operation of the joint venture, limited in scope and duration, and do not restrict competition outside the specific project.
- Citation
- [1995] IECA 433
- Parties
- Notifier: Group 91 Architects Ltd; Shareholder/director: Michael McGarry; Shareholder/director: Siobhan Ni Eanaigh; Shareholder/director: Derek Tynan; Shareholder/director: Sheila O'Donnell; Shareholder/director: John Tuomey; Shareholder/director: Niall McCullough; Shareholder/director: Valerie Mulvin; Shareholder/director: Shay Cleary; Shareholder/director: Paul Keogh; Shareholder/director: Rachael Chidlow; Shareholder/director: Yvonne Farrell; Shareholder/director: Shelley McNamara; Shareholder/director: Shane O'Toole
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision and Certificate Issued
- Outcome
- Certificate granted; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Shareholders Agreement, Joint Venture, Restrictive Covenants, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Ancillary Restraints
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Group 91 Architects Ltd
Notifier
Michael McGarry
Shareholder/director
Siobhan Ni Eanaigh
Shareholder/director
Derek Tynan
Shareholder/director
Sheila O'Donnell
Shareholder/director
John Tuomey
Shareholder/director
Niall McCullough
Shareholder/director
Valerie Mulvin
Shareholder/director
Shay Cleary
Shareholder/director
Paul Keogh
Shareholder/director
Rachael Chidlow
Shareholder/director
Yvonne Farrell
Shareholder/director
Shelley McNamara
Shareholder/director
Shane O'Toole
Shareholder/director
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification/decision / Final Decision and Certificate Issued
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the shareholders agreement and Deed of Covenant offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 by restricting competition
Ratio Decidendi
The notified shareholders agreement and Deed of Covenant do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 because the restrictions are necessary for the operation of the joint venture, limited in scope and duration, and do not restrict competition outside the specific project.
Court Disposition
Certificate granted; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the shareholders agreement and Deed of Covenant notified under Section 7(1) on 26 August, 1992 (notification no. CA/65/92), does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment