H&K International Inc/Shareholders Agreement [1995] IECA 401 (10th May, 1995)
The notified shareholders' agreement, including its non-compete, non-solicit, and confidentiality clauses, does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, as the restrictions are reasonable in duration and geographic scope and are necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of the parties without restricting competition in the State.
- Citation
- [1995] IECA 401
- Parties
- Notifier: H&K International Inc.; Shareholder: Bill Griffiths; Shareholder: Gerry Griffiths; Shareholder: Dan McGaw; Shareholder: David Massie; Shareholder: Flavius Ltd; Shareholder: Brian Ranalow; Shareholder: Hospital & Kitchen Holdings Corporation; Shareholder: Bill-Wil Holdings Ltd; Shareholder: Houri Holdings Ltd; Shareholder: Ger-Gay Holdings Ltd; Shareholder: Anjames Ltd; Shareholder: Frymount Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate granted; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Shareholders' Agreements, Non Compete Clauses, Non Solicitation Clauses, Confidentiality Clauses, Section 4 Competition Act 1991
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
H&K International Inc.
Notifier
Bill Griffiths
Shareholder
Gerry Griffiths
Shareholder
Dan McGaw
Shareholder
David Massie
Shareholder
Flavius Ltd
Shareholder
Brian Ranalow
Shareholder
Hospital & Kitchen Holdings Corporation
Shareholder
Bill-Wil Holdings Ltd
Shareholder
Houri Holdings Ltd
Shareholder
Ger-Gay Holdings Ltd
Shareholder
Anjames Ltd
Shareholder
Frymount Ltd
Shareholder
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the shareholders' agreement, including non-compete, non-solicit, and confidentiality clauses, offends Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified shareholders' agreement, including its non-compete, non-solicit, and confidentiality clauses, does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, as the restrictions are reasonable in duration and geographic scope and are necessary to protect the legitimate business interests of the parties without restricting competition in the State.
Court Disposition
Certificate granted; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- Certificate issued stating the notified shareholders' agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment