Hoorn & Winkel (Ireland)/Tenants of Ballinteer S.C. [1993] IECA 150 (3rd December, 1993)
The notified leases, including restrictive user clauses, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State and therefore do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1993] IECA 150
- Parties
- Notifier/landlord: Hoorn & Winkel (Ireland) Limited; Tenants: Tenants of Ballinteer Shopping Centre
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification/decision / Decision on Notification for Certificate Under Section 4(4) or Licence Under Section 4(2) of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate issued; notified agreements do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Shopping Centre Leases, Restrictive Covenants, Exclusive User Clauses, Agreements Between Undertakings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hoorn & Winkel (Ireland) Limited
Notifier/landlord
Tenants of Ballinteer Shopping Centre
Tenants
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification/decision / Decision on Notification for Certificate Under Section 4(4) or Licence Under Section 4(2) of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notified leases and restrictive user clauses offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified leases, including restrictive user clauses, do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State or any part of the State and therefore do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued; notified agreements do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- Certificate issued stating the agreements do not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment