Vesey -v- Kent Carty & Anor [2016] IECA 302 (26 October 2016)

Vesey -v- Kent Carty & Anor [2016] IECA 302 (26 October 2016)

The appellant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that any professional negligence by the respondent solicitors undermined or rendered unsatisfactory the outcome of his personal injuries action. The evidence showed the appellant's credibility issues were self-created, and no breach of professional standard occurred.

Citation
[2016] IECA 302
Parties
Plaintiff / Appellant: Patrick Vesey; First Defendant / Respondent: Kent Carty; Second Defendant / Respondent: Fabian Cadden & Co.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
26 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Solicitor's Duty of Care, Standard of Professional Conduct, Appeal Procedure, Expert Evidence Requirement
Professional Negligence Personal Injury Solicitor's Duty of Care Standard of Professional Conduct Appeal Procedure Expert Evidence Requirement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patrick Vesey

Plaintiff / Appellant

Kent Carty

First Defendant / Respondent

Fabian Cadden & Co.

Second Defendant / Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent solicitors were professionally negligent in handling the appellant's personal injury claim
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's instructions regarding appeal and witness handling were ignored
  3. 3 Whether the appellant suffered loss due to alleged professional negligence

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that any professional negligence by the respondent solicitors undermined or rendered unsatisfactory the outcome of his personal injuries action. The evidence showed the appellant's credibility issues were self-created, and no breach of professional standard occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs specified