Keena v Promontoria (Aran Ltd) & Ors (Unapproved) [2023] IECA 249 (13 October 2023)

Keena v Promontoria (Aran Ltd) & Ors (Unapproved) [2023] IECA 249 (13 October 2023)

The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case that a binding contract for sale of the Ard Rí Hotel existed, as the identity of the purchaser was not sufficiently disclosed or agreed with the respondents during negotiations, nor was there a sufficient memorandum or acts of part performance to render the alleged oral agreement enforceable under s.51 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009. The High Court correctly applied the legal test for dismissal by direction.

Citation
[2023] IECA 249
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Maria Keena; Defendant/respondent: Thomas Coughlan; Defendant/respondent: Ray Donovan; Defendant/respondent: Michael Dempsey; Defendant/respondent: Promontoria (Aran) Limited; Defendant/respondent: Luke Charleton; Defendant/respondent: Seamus Walsh; Defendant/respondent: Kilkenny Walsh Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 October 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Proceedings by Direction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed.
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Sale of Land, Statute of Frauds, Prima Facie Case, Part Performance, Dismissal by Direction
Contract Law Property Law Civil Procedure Specific Performance Sale of Land Statute of Frauds Prima Facie Case Part Performance +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maria Keena

Plaintiff/appellant

Thomas Coughlan

Defendant/respondent

Ray Donovan

Defendant/respondent

Michael Dempsey

Defendant/respondent

Promontoria (Aran) Limited

Defendant/respondent

Luke Charleton

Defendant/respondent

Seamus Walsh

Defendant/respondent

Kilkenny Walsh Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order Dismissing Proceedings by Direction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a binding contract for sale of land existed between appellant and respondents
  2. 2 Whether the identity of the purchaser was sufficiently established to satisfy statutory requirements
  3. 3 Whether acts of part performance rendered the alleged oral agreement enforceable

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to establish a prima facie case that a binding contract for sale of the Ard Rí Hotel existed, as the identity of the purchaser was not sufficiently disclosed or agreed with the respondents during negotiations, nor was there a sufficient memorandum or acts of part performance to render the alleged oral agreement enforceable under s.51 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009. The High Court correctly applied the legal test for dismissal by direction.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed.

Orders

  • Proceedings dismissed by direction for failure to establish a prima facie case.
  • No decree of specific performance granted.