O'Dwyer v. Boyd [2002] IESC 54 (04 July 2002)

O'Dwyer v. Boyd [2002] IESC 54 (04 July 2002)

The dispute regarding the slurry tank area, including whether Condition 33 applies, falls within the arbitration clause of the contract. The respondent did not take a step in the proceedings that would preclude a stay under s.5 of the Arbitration Act, 1980. The application for a stay was made in time, and the High Court correctly granted the stay pending arbitration.

Citation
[2002] IESC 54
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Declan O'Dwyer; Plaintiff/appellant: Julia Jones-O'Dwyer; Defendant/respondent: Robin Boyd
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
04 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order Granting Stay of Specific Performance Proceedings Pending Arbitration
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Specific Performance, Arbitration Agreement, Stay of Proceedings, Error in Contract, Jurisdiction to Stay Proceedings
Contract Law Arbitration Specific Performance Arbitration Agreement Stay of Proceedings Error in Contract Jurisdiction to Stay Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Declan O'Dwyer

Plaintiff/appellant

Julia Jones-O'Dwyer

Plaintiff/appellant

Robin Boyd

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order Granting Stay of Specific Performance Proceedings Pending Arbitration

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the dispute regarding the slurry tank area falls within the arbitration clause (Condition 51) of the contract of sale
  2. 2 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to grant a stay under s.5 of the Arbitration Act, 1980, or whether the respondent had taken a step in the proceedings precluding a stay

Ratio Decidendi

The dispute regarding the slurry tank area, including whether Condition 33 applies, falls within the arbitration clause of the contract. The respondent did not take a step in the proceedings that would preclude a stay under s.5 of the Arbitration Act, 1980. The application for a stay was made in time, and the High Court correctly granted the stay pending arbitration.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Stay of specific performance proceedings affirmed pending arbitration of the dispute under the contract