OF Fishing Ltd (Attorney General at the Relation of) -v- Port of Waterford Co [2006] IESC 47 (12 July 2006)
The Port of Waterford Company has the statutory power to sell parts of the harbour, including the North Wharf and Frank Cassin Wharf, under the Harbours Act 1996 and its memorandum of association. Historical statutory provisions conferring public rights over the wharves have been repealed, and no surviving public trust or right prevents the sale. The company's public obligations do not negate its power of sale, and no private or public right of the appellant is infringed by the proposed sale.
- Citation
- [2006] IESC 47
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Attorney General at the Relation of O F Fishing Limited; Defendant/respondent: Port of Waterford Company
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Powers of Statutory Bodies, Ultra Vires, Public Trust Doctrine, Harbour Authority Powers, Sale of Public Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General at the Relation of O F Fishing Limited
Plaintiff/appellant
Port of Waterford Company
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Port of Waterford Company has the statutory power to sell parts of the harbour, specifically the North Wharf and Frank Cassin Wharf.
- 2 Whether the wharves are held as public trust assets or subject to public rights preventing their sale.
- 3 Whether historical statutes, charters, or public user confer inalienable public rights over the wharves.
Ratio Decidendi
The Port of Waterford Company has the statutory power to sell parts of the harbour, including the North Wharf and Frank Cassin Wharf, under the Harbours Act 1996 and its memorandum of association. Historical statutory provisions conferring public rights over the wharves have been repealed, and no surviving public trust or right prevents the sale. The company's public obligations do not negate its power of sale, and no private or public right of the appellant is infringed by the proposed sale.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The order of the High Court is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment