Hosey -v- Ulster Bank Ltd & Ors [2017] IECA 257 (12 October 2017)
The amended statement of claim disclosed a cause of action for negligence, breach of duty, and breach of fiduciary duty against Weldon & Co. The claim was not bound to fail, as factual disputes and potential documentary evidence could support Mrs. Hosey's case. The High Court judge correctly refused to dismiss the proceedings at an interlocutory stage.
- Citation
- [2017] IECA 257
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Respondent: Margaret Hosey; 1st Named Defendant / Appellant: Ulster Bank Ireland Limited; 2nd Named Defendant / Appellant: Brendan Weldon practising under the style and title of Brendan Weldon and Company
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Refusing to Dismiss Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out Pleadings, Negligence, Duty of Care, Fiduciary Duty, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Hosey
Plaintiff / Respondent
Ulster Bank Ireland Limited
1st Named Defendant / Appellant
Brendan Weldon practising under the style and title of Brendan Weldon and Company
2nd Named Defendant / Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Refusing to Dismiss Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff's amended statement of claim discloses a cause of action against Weldon & Co.
- 2 Whether the proceedings should be dismissed as bound to fail or as an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The amended statement of claim disclosed a cause of action for negligence, breach of duty, and breach of fiduciary duty against Weldon & Co. The claim was not bound to fail, as factual disputes and potential documentary evidence could support Mrs. Hosey's case. The High Court judge correctly refused to dismiss the proceedings at an interlocutory stage.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal of Weldon & Co. is dismissed.
- The High Court order refusing to strike out the proceedings is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment