Aer Rianta Cpt v. Ryanair Ltd. [2001] IESC 94; [2002] 1 ILRM 381 (13 November 2001)
The Supreme Court held that, despite weaknesses in Ryanair's defence, the affidavit evidence and factual disputes were sufficiently substantial and credible to warrant a plenary hearing rather than summary judgment.
- Citation
- [2002] 1 ILRM 381
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Aer Rianta CPT; Defendant/appellant: Ryanair Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court summary judgment set aside; case remitted for plenary hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Variation of Contract, Promissory Estoppel, Airport Charges, Affidavit Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aer Rianta CPT
Plaintiff/respondent
Ryanair Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant/Appellant Ryanair had a fair or reasonable probability of a real or bona fide defence to Aer Rianta's claim for landing charges and passenger load fees
- 2 Whether alleged oral variations or collateral contracts existed altering the published discount scheme
- 3 Whether promissory estoppel applied due to representations by Aer Rianta's executive
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that, despite weaknesses in Ryanair's defence, the affidavit evidence and factual disputes were sufficiently substantial and credible to warrant a plenary hearing rather than summary judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court summary judgment set aside; case remitted for plenary hearing.
Orders
- Proceedings remitted for plenary hearing before the High Court.
- Summary judgment in favour of Aer Rianta set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment