Danske Bank A/S trading as Danske Bank -v- Fox and Fox -v- McDonald & Anor [2017] IECA 121 (26 April 2017)

Danske Bank A/S trading as Danske Bank -v- Fox and Fox -v- McDonald & Anor [2017] IECA 121 (26 April 2017)

Mr. Fox failed to demonstrate a bona fide defence to the summary judgment claim as he had contractually agreed to repay the restructured loan within twelve months and defaulted; the appointment of the receiver was valid under the mortgage terms and statutory provisions, and the receiver had the power of sale and to appoint an auctioneer.

Citation
[2017] IECA 121
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Danske Bank A/S Trading As Danske Bank; Defendant/appellant: Fintan Fox; Defendant/respondent: Declan McDonald
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
26 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Both appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Appointment of Receiver, Mortgage Enforcement, Loan Restructuring, Powers of Attorney
Banking Law Property Law Contract Law Summary Judgment Appointment of Receiver Mortgage Enforcement Loan Restructuring Powers of Attorney

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Danske Bank A/S Trading As Danske Bank

Plaintiff/respondent

Fintan Fox

Defendant/appellant

Declan McDonald

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment was properly granted against Mr. Fox for non-payment of a restructured loan
  2. 2 Whether the appointment of the receiver over Mr. Fox's properties was lawful
  3. 3 Whether Danske Bank mismanaged Mr. Fox's accounts or impermissibly altered loan terms

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Fox failed to demonstrate a bona fide defence to the summary judgment claim as he had contractually agreed to repay the restructured loan within twelve months and defaulted; the appointment of the receiver was valid under the mortgage terms and statutory provisions, and the receiver had the power of sale and to appoint an auctioneer.

Court Disposition

Both appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Summary judgment in favour of Danske Bank for €1,472,996.95 affirmed
  • Dismissal of Mr. Fox's plenary claim against Danske Bank and the receiver affirmed