ACC Loan Management DAC -v- O'Toole [2017] IECA 316 (06 December 2017)

ACC Loan Management DAC -v- O'Toole [2017] IECA 316 (06 December 2017)

It is not clear that the defendant has no arguable defence on the issues of whether the guarantee is an instrument under seal and whether ACC should have set off the deposit monies earlier. These issues require plenary hearing for fair determination.

Citation
[2017] IECA 316
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: ACC Loan Management DAC; Defendant/appellant: Erwin O'Toole
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
06 December 2017
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (summary Judgment) / Appeal From High Court Summary Judgment to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Personal Guarantee, Limitation Period, Set Off, Statute of Limitations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ACC Loan Management DAC

Plaintiff/respondent

Erwin O'Toole

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (summary Judgment) / Appeal From High Court Summary Judgment to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the absence of a physical seal on the guarantee renders it not an instrument under seal for limitation purposes
  2. 2 Whether ACC was required to set off deposit monies at an earlier date, affecting interest liability

Ratio Decidendi

It is not clear that the defendant has no arguable defence on the issues of whether the guarantee is an instrument under seal and whether ACC should have set off the deposit monies earlier. These issues require plenary hearing for fair determination.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Matter adjourned to plenary hearing
  • Defendant permitted to defend on two grounds: (1) guarantee not an instrument under seal; (2) ACC should have set off deposit earlier