Cannon Hygenic Products (Ire) Ltd/ Initial Services (Ire) Ltd Supply Agreement [1998] IECA 494 (5th February, 1998)

Cannon Hygenic Products (Ire) Ltd/ Initial Services (Ire) Ltd Supply Agreement [1998] IECA 494 (5th February, 1998)

The agreement does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition and does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, as the market remains competitive and the restrictions are ancillary to the commercial relationship.

Citation
[1998] IECA 494
Parties
Notifier/applicant: Cannon Hygienic Products (Ireland) Limited; Counterparty/respondent: Initial Services (Ireland) Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification/administrative Decision / Final Decision
Outcome
Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) Competition Act, 1991.
Legal Topics
Supply Agreement, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Market Definition, Ancillary Restraints

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cannon Hygienic Products (Ireland) Limited

Notifier/applicant

Initial Services (Ireland) Limited

Counterparty/respondent

Procedural Posture

Competition Notification/administrative Decision / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the notified supply agreement restricts competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition and does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, as the market remains competitive and the restrictions are ancillary to the commercial relationship.

Court Disposition

Certificate issued; agreement does not offend Section 4(1) Competition Act, 1991.

Orders

  • Certificate granted that the agreement does not offend Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.