Omnitron / Cryptovision A/S /Cablelink Ltd. / Tandberg A/S [1998] IECA 496 (1st April, 1998)

Omnitron / Cryptovision A/S /Cablelink Ltd. / Tandberg A/S [1998] IECA 496 (1st April, 1998)

The notified arrangements do not prevent, restrict or distort competition; the security for supply does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.

Citation
[1998] IECA 496
Parties
Notifying Party: Omnitron Limited; Notifying Party: Cryptovision A/S; Notifying Party: Cablelink Limited; Notifying Party: Tandberg A/S
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Notification
Outcome
Certificate issued; notified arrangements do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Legal Topics
Supply Agreements, Security for Supply, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Anti Competitive Agreements
Competition Law Supply Agreements Security for Supply Section 4 Competition Act 1991 Anti Competitive Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Omnitron Limited

Notifying Party

Cryptovision A/S

Notifying Party

Cablelink Limited

Notifying Party

Tandberg A/S

Notifying Party

Procedural Posture

Competition Notification / Decision on Notification

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the notified supply security arrangements offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991

Ratio Decidendi

The notified arrangements do not prevent, restrict or distort competition; the security for supply does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.

Court Disposition

Certificate issued; notified arrangements do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.

Orders

  • Certificate granted confirming the notified arrangements do not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.