Dwyer v The Commisioner of An Garda Siochana & Ors [2020] IESC 4 (24 February 2020)

Dwyer v The Commisioner of An Garda Siochana & Ors [2020] IESC 4 (24 February 2020)

The Supreme Court held that s. 6(1)(a) of the Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011, which provides for universal retention of telephony metadata and access by Garda authorities without prior independent review, is inconsistent with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC as interpreted by the CJEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The regime lacks sufficient targeting, objective criteria, and independent oversight, and thus fails the proportionality and necessity requirements under EU law.

Citation
[2020] IESC 4
Parties
Plaintiff / Respondent: Graham Dwyer; Defendant / Appellant: The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána; Defendant / Appellant: The Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources; Defendant / Appellant: Ireland; Defendant / Appellant: The Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
24 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; High Court declaration of inconsistency with EU law upheld.
Legal Topics
Telecommunications Data Retention, Right to Privacy, Proportionality, EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Criminal Evidence Admissibility
Constitutional Law European Union Law Criminal Law Data Protection Telecommunications Data Retention Right to Privacy Proportionality EU Charter of Fundamental Rights +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Graham Dwyer

Plaintiff / Respondent

The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána

Defendant / Appellant

The Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources

Defendant / Appellant

Ireland

Defendant / Appellant

The Attorney General

Defendant / Appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether s. 6(1)(a) of the Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011 is inconsistent with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC as interpreted by the CJEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
  2. 2 Whether the Irish regime for retention and access to telephony metadata is compatible with EU law and the Charter
  3. 3 Whether the access regime under the 2011 Act provides sufficient independent oversight and safeguards

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that s. 6(1)(a) of the Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011, which provides for universal retention of telephony metadata and access by Garda authorities without prior independent review, is inconsistent with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC as interpreted by the CJEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The regime lacks sufficient targeting, objective criteria, and independent oversight, and thus fails the proportionality and necessity requirements under EU law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; High Court declaration of inconsistency with EU law upheld.

Orders

  • Declaration that s. 6(1)(a) of the Communications (Retention of Data) Act 2011 is inconsistent with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58/EC and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.